Trees with red berries

Discussion in 'Plants: Identification' started by Peggy, Aug 31, 2009.

  1. Peggy

    Peggy Member

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    delta, bc
    Would you be able to tell me what these trees are, seen along the roadside in Delta, BC.
    Thank you so much.
    Peggy
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Ron B

    Ron B Paragon of Plants 10 Years

    Messages:
    21,250
    Likes Received:
    786
    Location:
    WA USA (Z8)
    Two black hawthorns and a Pacific red elder. Superficially quite similar Crataegus douglasii and C. suksdorfii both occur here, are told apart by how many anthers are carried within the flowers and how serious their thorns are. Such morphological distinctions may seem comparatively trivial but the two species have different DNA.
     
  3. Peggy

    Peggy Member

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    delta, bc
    Thank you so much. I now see that the leaves are similar on the first 2 photos so must be the black hawthorns, even though the berries are a different colour. Are they the same species? The last one with the big clump of red berries must be the Pacific red elder.
    Thanks again
    Peggy
     
  4. Ron B

    Ron B Paragon of Plants 10 Years

    Messages:
    21,250
    Likes Received:
    786
    Location:
    WA USA (Z8)
    It depends. Hawthorn expert J.B. Phipps has black hawthorns chopped up into multiple additional species in his 2003 book Hawthorns and Medlars, I do have to wonder if these are all solid. A technical treatment was supposed to follow, after which any other botanists who might care to would hash these over, accept or reject them.
     
  5. Peggy

    Peggy Member

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    delta, bc
    I have one more tree with red berries, also seen along the roadside in Delta.
    I think it is different than the others. do you know what this one is?
    Thanks
    Peggy
     

    Attached Files:

  6. togata57

    togata57 Generous Contributor 10 Years

    Messages:
    3,417
    Likes Received:
    364
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Looks like Mountain Ash.
     
  7. Ron B

    Ron B Paragon of Plants 10 Years

    Messages:
    21,250
    Likes Received:
    786
    Location:
    WA USA (Z8)
    Sorbus aucuparia is a naturalized weed here. The previous two (or perhaps three) are native.
     
  8. Michael F

    Michael F Paragon of Plants Forums Moderator 10 Years

    Messages:
    11,417
    Likes Received:
    501
    Location:
    Britain zone 8/9
    Rowan Sorbus aucuparia. Not an ash (Fraxinus); that's a misidentification.
     
  9. Peggy

    Peggy Member

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    delta, bc
    Thanks everyone, for your help. It is much appreciated. I am a nosy parker and want to know these things.
    Peggy
     
  10. Ron B

    Ron B Paragon of Plants 10 Years

    Messages:
    21,250
    Likes Received:
    786
    Location:
    WA USA (Z8)
    When used for Sorbus the "ash" is presented in combination with "mountain".

    Ash.

    Mountain ash.

    Mountain ash is also of course used for unrelated tree(s).

    Clarification, when required is achieved by using botanical names or other indicators.
     
  11. togata57

    togata57 Generous Contributor 10 Years

    Messages:
    3,417
    Likes Received:
    364
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    'Scuse me, but if one looks up "Mountain Ash", one will find the correct classification of Sorbus aucuparia. Just one of those annoying inaccurate popular misnomers. Did I say Fraxinus? Hmm. Don't think so.
     
  12. Michael F

    Michael F Paragon of Plants Forums Moderator 10 Years

    Messages:
    11,417
    Likes Received:
    501
    Location:
    Britain zone 8/9
    If it is annoying and inaccurate, then don't promote it. Let it vanish into the mists of historical obscurity. Join educated modernity and call it a rowan.
     
  13. togata57

    togata57 Generous Contributor 10 Years

    Messages:
    3,417
    Likes Received:
    364
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    I humbly thank thee for thy ukase, o sage* and authoritative one. Allow me to retreat from the presence, head bowed, forelock firmly tugged.

    *or, perhaps, Salvia?
     
  14. Ron B

    Ron B Paragon of Plants 10 Years

    Messages:
    21,250
    Likes Received:
    786
    Location:
    WA USA (Z8)
    Common mountain ash. European mountain ash. Rowan. Roan. Witchen tree. Witchwood. Fowler's service-tree. Quickbeam. Quicken.

    Not seeing much likelihood of - or any serious need for - the Eurocentric "rowan' becoming prevalent here. The non-botanical are not aware of "unique" common names and the botanical already have botanical (scientific) names to use for precision.
     
  15. Peggy

    Peggy Member

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    delta, bc
    This is interesting. I can see that identification can be more complex than I realized.
    Thanks everyone.
    Peggy
     
  16. Michael F

    Michael F Paragon of Plants Forums Moderator 10 Years

    Messages:
    11,417
    Likes Received:
    501
    Location:
    Britain zone 8/9
    It is a European tree. What right does the USA have to dictate to us what our native species should be called? Can't you show the decency of some respect for our right to name our own native plants?
     
  17. Andrey Zharkikh

    Andrey Zharkikh Well-Known Member 10 Years

    Messages:
    1,214
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Guys, guys!
    Make it simple about Sorbus - call it "ryabina". There are several Russian songs that use this lovely tree as a symbol of unhappy love.
    :))
     
  18. saltcedar

    saltcedar Rising Contributor 10 Years

    Messages:
    4,398
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Austin, Tx
    Michael you can and should call it as you like. All we're asking is the
    right to do the same on this side of the pond. Why's that a problem?
     

Share This Page